Another British medical organisation has come out in support of vaping as a safer alternative to smoking. In a surprising development from California, the state governor has blocked two bills that would have made it illegal to vape in many public spaces – the new law was judged “too coercive” even for Sacramento. Meanwhile the WHO and other tobacco control groups continue their attacks on harm reduction groups.
British Psychological Society endorses vaping
In another sign of the British medical establishment’s swing towards tobacco harm reduction, the British Psychological Society published a new briefing paper this week which places the organisation firmly in the pro-THR camp.
Titled Changing Behaviour: Electronic Cigarettes, the report is aimed at educating everyone involved in smoking cessation about vapour products. It seems to have been prompted by concerns about the misinformation spread by many public health activists, which has misled millions of people into thinking vaping is as harmful as smoking. Many medical professionals now recognise that anti-THR extremists are causing harm by painting e-cigarettes as dangerous, and there’s some pushback now going on.
As well as discussing the relative risks more accurately, the BPS report also makes a series of policy recommendations. Most of these should be welcomed by vapers – for example, the report says e-cigs should not be taxed or penalised by vape-free legislation. There’s also welcome criticism of the advertising ban imposed by the EU. Other aspects of the EU’s crackdown come under fire as well; the BPS believe that higher-strength liquids should be on the market and manufacturers should be freed from “unnecessary, burdensome and costly” regulations.
There’s increasing concern among vaping advocates that e-cigarettes are being hijacked by public health and turned into a cessation tool, with no consideration given to recreational users and former smokers who’ve already quit, but in general the BPS paper has been welcomed as relatively positive by the public health industry’s standards.
California governor vetoes anti-vaping bills
In a hint that even California might be reaching saturation point with nanny state policies, last Friday Governor Jerry Brown vetoed two bills that would have piled even more restrictions on the state’s vapers.
The bills, passed by both houses of the state legislature, would have made it a criminal offence to smoke or vape on beaches or in parks anywhere in California. Their sponsors, Democratic Party senator Steve Glazer and Assemblyman Marc Levine, claimed the laws would protect people from “second-hand smoking”, although there is no risk to bystanders from smoking outdoors and no such thing as second-hand vapour at all.
Brown, showing a degree of sanity that’s rarely seen in the Golden State these days, dismissed the bills as “too coercive” and criticised the $100 fine they imposed – which could rise to as much as $485 once court fees were added. “If people can’t smoke even on a deserted beach, where can they?” Brown wrote in his veto decision. “There must be some limit to the coercive power of government.” That’s not something you hear very often in Sacramento.
Johnson Creek closes
In a significant blow to the US e-liquid industry, juice maker Johnson Creek announced on Monday that it would be going out of business the following day. The company had been operating for nine years, and was one of the pioneers in high quality US-made e-liquids. However, according to Monday’s statement they are now in bankruptcy and unable to continue trading.
So far there’s no evidence that Johnson Creek’s demise is linked to the cost of complying with the FDA’s Deeming Regulations, but given the size of their range this probably didn’t help. Their statement says that they hope to come out of bankruptcy and resume selling products, but doesn’t give any clues as to when or if that might happen.
Read more at vapingpost.com